Barb McQuade hosts #SistersInLaw to review the SCOTUS decision upholding a US-based TikTok ban unless it divests from its Chinese parent company and explain the balance of free speech and national security concerns taken into account in their ruling.  Then, the #Sisters analyze Pam Bondi’s performance in her confirmation hearings and weigh whether Pete Hegseth has the qualifications or moral certitude to lead the DoD.  They also investigate the future of Jack Smith’s report, how it treats Trump’s actions on J6 in light of the 14th Amendment, and Judge Cannon’s continued interference in its potential release.

Jill Wine-Banks hosts #SistersInLaw to discuss Trump’s unconditional discharge, the role his election to the presidency had on his treatment by the law, his status as a felon, and the SCOTUS ruling on his appeal.  Then, the #Sisters investigate whether we’ll ever see Jack Smith’s report, the validity of Judge Cannon’s attempt to halt its release, and if Biden can use his new legal immunity to get it out to us.  They also expose Mark Zuckerberg’s war on fact-checkers across Meta’s platforms, the pivot to an X-style community notes system, and the growing risk of misinformation and disinformation throughout the social media landscape.

Kimberly Atkins Stohr hosts #SistersInLaw to discuss the law enforcement response to the NOLA terror attack, the effect of its designation as terrorism, the protections granted by our civil liberties, and how to combat radicalization.  Then, the #Sisters give their takes on the SCOTUS’ year-end report, calling out the justices for undermining the rule of law by failing to live up to their ethics guidelines and inadequate transparency.  They also investigate whether Section 3 of the 14th Amendment can keep Trump out of the Oval Office and what it would have required from our lawmakers.